Your Ad Here

Intelligent Design and lack of Intelligence (VFX)

Back


In response to



The Mystery Box video



Channel: Education
Uploaded: November 3, 2008 at 1:10 am
Author: g0at

Length: 00:09:50
Rating: 4.40
Views: 5537

Tags: kent hovind young earth old bible creation evolution Intelligent Design and Plasticine intelligent design venom fang VFX Venomfang g0at atheist atheism

Video Comments:
gir908922 (January 7, 2009 at 1:01 am)
Absolutely, mathmexican. Charles Darwin proved that when he went to the Galapagos Islands and studied the animal.
NMLG1986 (January 4, 2009 at 3:28 pm)
Infinite regression is still not answered. And only something can make something happen. So if nothing is the cause of everything there would be nothing. Chance cannot possible the cause of everything, because chance is causeless. So something has to be the cause of everything, and that something had to have the strength to create or move everything the way it is. Just like the guy with the salt is the one who does everything, it's not chance, it's MB, pan, gravity and salt.
alex26red (January 2, 2009 at 4:43 pm)
Your point about viruses and animals evolving getting smarter and better is false. No one has ever proved this... Show me some documentation showing the hard true unrefutable facts of something evolving into anther kind.. And don't give me that natural selection crap... that has never shown to be enough for macro evolution. As for viruses they can evade drugs that have worked on them before but only by losing information. Show me one mutation of something gaining new information.
alex26red (January 2, 2009 at 4:30 pm)
Actualy the eye is perfect... depending on what kind of animal you are and what your needs are... Just because a hawk can see further does not mean that would be perfect for a human.
mathmexican4234 (January 3, 2009 at 10:34 pm)
lol, giving something besides evolution credit for creatures being adapted for their needs...if they weren't adapted for their needs THEY WOULD BE DEAD...
jityr2 (January 2, 2009 at 1:30 pm)
During the fifth minute he talked about how a human can't create more complex humans. Well recently I saw a website, I forgot which one, that talks about distant future concepts. Maybe quantum computing. Which doesn't rule out the possibility of humans creating more complex humans. In fact a couple decades ago an article said that it would take a computer the size of the empire state building to be able to think like the human brain. So all you have to do is build a computer bigger than that.
sphingting (January 2, 2009 at 12:21 pm)
Many people far more well educated than you have thought of it and the conclusion they all come to is evolution.
anarchopunk69 (January 1, 2009 at 10:52 pm)
another question I would like to add if we are made in the image of god supposedly you would thing we would have the best eyes out of all of the animals but we don't so does god have crappy vision or did he want us to have mediocre eye sit to view his " awesome creation"
burns725 (January 1, 2009 at 10:34 pm)
phlagelem motors in bacteria. thats the answer to your question. look it up.
JohananRaatz (December 22, 2008 at 9:22 pm)
ID isn't science as it isn't falsifiable. However unlike creationism it isn't provably wrong either. To be precise, it isn't science or pseudoscience as the questions it asks are outside of scientific inquiry entirely. It's more akin to the Turing test or applied to biological design. Or perhaps more accurately what they do as SETI applied to genetic information instead of radio signals.